Peculiarities of Newspaper Style in English and Ukrainian Languages 001

Розміщено 13-05-10 у розділі Освіта.

The Role of Mass Media in Our Life (Роль мас медіа чи засобів масової інформації у нашому житті)

“When people ask about the effects of media they generally turn out to be interested in something else of which media  might be a cause such as  violence or political bias. A history of media could easily slip into being a history of a society as a whole. This in itself reflects the centrality of media in our lives.” (Colin Seymour-Ure 1991:239)

Now when you ask people about the effect of media upon  them, you can often get unsatisfactory  answers. It is  clear that media has influence to some extend over individuals and groups. Media create and destroy  reputations; pop starts, as a class, were the creation of media. Media transformed the economics and political life of many nations.

Of course, now media is a part of our lives, our history, but its influence should not be exaggerated, because as Colin Seymour Ure said “People in 1945-1990 were not the puppets of the media barons, jerking at  every tug of the string. Nor, equally, can we seriously believe that popular attitudes  were entirely  unmoved by the media” (Colin Seymour-Ure 1991:240)

Still for most people the mass media are the major sources of information about  world   events  and about political affairs . Both images and texts form the basis of  public  perceptions and responses to events. “It is therefore  conceptually useful  to distinguish  between what  the mass media tell us to think about – this is signaled by the events they  cover – and what specific   attitudes  or opinions we have to adopt towards those  events, though clearly  these distinctions  may be  difficult to uphold in practice” (Negrine  :35). Because it depends only on mass  media  which events to select and how these events are to be presented. Therefore  we do not only  get information but the information  is already  interpreted and explained to us. To paraphrase C. Wright  Mills, “…men (and women!) live in second-hand worlds… The quality of their lives is determined by meanings they have received from  others. Everyone lives in a world of such  meanings” (Negrine   :36). Because only a few people  can  experience the events at first hand and we rely on the mass  media  to inform at about these events.

Of all the existing means of mass communication, despite television’s growing  importance  as a source of information, regular readers of newspapers continue to attach  a great  deal  of weight to the print medium. Means of communication have  developed  since  the inception of press in the 17-th – 18-th centuries. Yet  the press has gone  many  significant changes: new  forms  of journalism  have  developed, there have  been  changes  in printing techniques and even  changes in perceptions of the role of the newspaper within  society. Furthermore, the press is now only one medium amongst  many. Radio, and later television have usurped  some  of its duties (Negrine, p. 39).

Before investigating the  problem of stylistic  functions  of colloquialisms  and their reproduction in TT, we should compare both Ukrainian and English  newspaper  styles. As we know,  English newspaper  style has  its  peculiarities: it  still  differs   from the  Ukrainian  one due  to the  more frequent  use of colloquial,  slang  and vulgar  elements, various  paraphrases, eye-catching headlines, although the Ukrainian language of mass media is quickly catching up.

Теги: ,

Схожі публікації

Коментувати

;